<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Political Jackass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicaljackass.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com</link>
	<description>As Fair and Balanced as Fox News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>as for who did not vote in that 90-8 vote... John McCain.  Funny who is the "deregulator" now Biden... but to be honest to blame it on this bill is somewhat of a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as for who did not vote in that 90-8 vote&#8230; John McCain.  Funny who is the &#8220;deregulator&#8221; now Biden&#8230; but to be honest to blame it on this bill is somewhat of a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act

Yes at first he voted no, but after some revisions and concessions to democrats, as well as to make it veto proof, it was accepted bipartisan.  That was the final version of the bill and Biden voted yes.  Without reworking and other concessions, it would not have survived a veto from President Clinton.  That is why they had the 90-8 vote.  You had to resolve differences in House and Senate in November.  Once resolved, which Biden voted yes for, it was sent to Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act</a></p>
<p>Yes at first he voted no, but after some revisions and concessions to democrats, as well as to make it veto proof, it was accepted bipartisan.  That was the final version of the bill and Biden voted yes.  Without reworking and other concessions, it would not have survived a veto from President Clinton.  That is why they had the 90-8 vote.  You had to resolve differences in House and Senate in November.  Once resolved, which Biden voted yes for, it was sent to Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>Again, you are referring to the vote on the conference report and not the vote on the actual bill, which took place in May of 1999 and not november of 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, you are referring to the vote on the conference report and not the vote on the actual bill, which took place in May of 1999 and not november of 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by jr565</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>jr565</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>actually biden did vote yes:

http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually biden did vote yes:</p>
<p><a href="http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/" rel="nofollow">http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>He did vote against it.   http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00105

What you were reading was the vote on the conference report, which took place 6 months after the bill had already passed in the senate, and just over a week before it was signed into law.  The bill was not passed 90-8; it was passed 54-44, almost strictly down party lines (The lone Democrat to vote for the bill was Ernest Hollings of South Carolina).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did vote against it.   <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00105" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00105</a></p>
<p>What you were reading was the vote on the conference report, which took place 6 months after the bill had already passed in the senate, and just over a week before it was signed into law.  The bill was not passed 90-8; it was passed 54-44, almost strictly down party lines (The lone Democrat to vote for the bill was Ernest Hollings of South Carolina).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Either the author of this is downright dishonest or didn't do his/her homework. Biden voted no on an earlier version of the bill but voted yes on the final version, which Democrat Bill Clinton signed into law. Rmartin's link to the senate web site confirms this as does a fact check from Iowa tv station KCRG. 

http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&#38;id=30188584</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either the author of this is downright dishonest or didn&#8217;t do his/her homework. Biden voted no on an earlier version of the bill but voted yes on the final version, which Democrat Bill Clinton signed into law. Rmartin&#8217;s link to the senate web site confirms this as does a fact check from Iowa tv station KCRG. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&amp;id=30188584" rel="nofollow">http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&amp;id=30188584</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin Can&#8217;t Name Any Supreme Court Cases (Video) by Roschelle</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/10/01/palin-cant-name-any-supreme-court-cases/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Roschelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=453#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>She is the sickest joke ever played on America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is the sickest joke ever played on America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do You Really Know Ron Paul? by Javier</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2007/10/31/do-you-really-know-ron-paul/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/2007/10/31/do-you-really-know-ron-paul/#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>It is really good that people is starting to see Ron Paul as a real option and need to start bullshiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really good that people is starting to see Ron Paul as a real option and need to start bullshiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No! by rmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>rmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>What are your sources for this vote?  According to the US Senate's own website  Biden did vote yes on deregulation on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill

Here you can see a vote by Senator.  It passed 90-8

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#38;session=1&#38;vote=00354</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your sources for this vote?  According to the US Senate&#8217;s own website  Biden did vote yes on deregulation on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill</p>
<p>Here you can see a vote by Senator.  It passed 90-8</p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00354" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00354</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin Made Rape Victims Pay by McCain Voted Against Biden Law Requiring Free Rape Exams</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/11/palin-made-rape-victims-pay/#comment-2918</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Voted Against Biden Law Requiring Free Rape Exams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=371#comment-2918</guid>
		<description>[...] only does Palin think that rape exams should be at the expense of the victim, McCain voted against a law that would make the exams free. So, is McCain/Palin the pro-rape [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only does Palin think that rape exams should be at the expense of the victim, McCain voted against a law that would make the exams free. So, is McCain/Palin the pro-rape [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
