<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1999 Gramm Deregulation Act: McCain Yes, Biden No!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/</link>
	<description>As Fair and Balanced as Fox News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-3004</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-3004</guid>
		<description>By the way the use of wikipedia as a source is NEVER a good way to prove anything political except who has been logging into wikipedia lately.  That&#039;s the net equivalent of starting a research paper with &quot;Webster&#039;s dictionary defines... as...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way the use of wikipedia as a source is NEVER a good way to prove anything political except who has been logging into wikipedia lately.  That&#8217;s the net equivalent of starting a research paper with &#8220;Webster&#8217;s dictionary defines&#8230; as&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-3003</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-3003</guid>
		<description>Once again, as admin stated.  THE BILL PASSED --- IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM.  You are refering to a procedural (sp?) vote that occurred later.  Here&#039;s a link:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105&amp;page-command=print

-Notice the date of the bill (May 6)

-Notice what it says right underneath that date (THIS BILL PASSED).

DEAL WITH IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, as admin stated.  THE BILL PASSED &#8212; IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM.  You are refering to a procedural (sp?) vote that occurred later.  Here&#8217;s a link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105&amp;page-command=print" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105&amp;page-command=print</a></p>
<p>-Notice the date of the bill (May 6)</p>
<p>-Notice what it says right underneath that date (THIS BILL PASSED).</p>
<p>DEAL WITH IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>as for who did not vote in that 90-8 vote... John McCain.  Funny who is the &quot;deregulator&quot; now Biden... but to be honest to blame it on this bill is somewhat of a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as for who did not vote in that 90-8 vote&#8230; John McCain.  Funny who is the &#8220;deregulator&#8221; now Biden&#8230; but to be honest to blame it on this bill is somewhat of a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act

Yes at first he voted no, but after some revisions and concessions to democrats, as well as to make it veto proof, it was accepted bipartisan.  That was the final version of the bill and Biden voted yes.  Without reworking and other concessions, it would not have survived a veto from President Clinton.  That is why they had the 90-8 vote.  You had to resolve differences in House and Senate in November.  Once resolved, which Biden voted yes for, it was sent to Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act</a></p>
<p>Yes at first he voted no, but after some revisions and concessions to democrats, as well as to make it veto proof, it was accepted bipartisan.  That was the final version of the bill and Biden voted yes.  Without reworking and other concessions, it would not have survived a veto from President Clinton.  That is why they had the 90-8 vote.  You had to resolve differences in House and Senate in November.  Once resolved, which Biden voted yes for, it was sent to Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>Again, you are referring to the vote on the conference report and not the vote on the actual bill, which took place in May of 1999 and not november of 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, you are referring to the vote on the conference report and not the vote on the actual bill, which took place in May of 1999 and not november of 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr565</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>jr565</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>actually biden did vote yes:

http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually biden did vote yes:</p>
<p><a href="http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/" rel="nofollow">http://thepage.time.com/mccain-camp-veep-debate-release-the-1999-deregulation-that-joe-biden-supported/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>He did vote against it.   http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00105

What you were reading was the vote on the conference report, which took place 6 months after the bill had already passed in the senate, and just over a week before it was signed into law.  The bill was not passed 90-8; it was passed 54-44, almost strictly down party lines (The lone Democrat to vote for the bill was Ernest Hollings of South Carolina).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did vote against it.   <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00105" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00105</a></p>
<p>What you were reading was the vote on the conference report, which took place 6 months after the bill had already passed in the senate, and just over a week before it was signed into law.  The bill was not passed 90-8; it was passed 54-44, almost strictly down party lines (The lone Democrat to vote for the bill was Ernest Hollings of South Carolina).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Either the author of this is downright dishonest or didn&#039;t do his/her homework. Biden voted no on an earlier version of the bill but voted yes on the final version, which Democrat Bill Clinton signed into law. Rmartin&#039;s link to the senate web site confirms this as does a fact check from Iowa tv station KCRG. 

http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&amp;id=30188584</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either the author of this is downright dishonest or didn&#8217;t do his/her homework. Biden voted no on an earlier version of the bill but voted yes on the final version, which Democrat Bill Clinton signed into law. Rmartin&#8217;s link to the senate web site confirms this as does a fact check from Iowa tv station KCRG. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&amp;id=30188584" rel="nofollow">http://www.kcrg.com/explorepolitics/?feed=bim&amp;id=30188584</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaljackass.com/2008/09/17/1999-gramm-deregulation-act-mccain-yes-biden-no/comment-page-1/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>rmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicaljackass.com/?p=395#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>What are your sources for this vote?  According to the US Senate&#039;s own website  Biden did vote yes on deregulation on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill

Here you can see a vote by Senator.  It passed 90-8

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00354</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your sources for this vote?  According to the US Senate&#8217;s own website  Biden did vote yes on deregulation on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill</p>
<p>Here you can see a vote by Senator.  It passed 90-8</p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00354" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00354</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
